Welcome to American Journal of Biomedical Sciences
 
  Home    Missions and Scope    Editorial Board    Instructions for Authors    Contact Us

 

 

Am. J. Biomed. Sci. Am. J. Biomed. Sci. 2017, 9(3), 119-126; doi:10.5099/aj170300119
Received: 17 May 2017; | Revised: 14 July 2017; | Accepted: 31 July 2017

 

Comparing Trio-Modified Papanicolaou Staining Methods for Assessing Liquid-Based Cytology Samples

 

Bolaji Efosa ODIGIE*1, 2, 3 and Peter Uwadiegwu ACHUKWU2, 3

1Medical Laboratory Science, School of Basic Medical Sciences, College of Medical Sciences, University of Benin, Benin City, Nigeria.

2Medical Laboratory Science, Faculty of Health Sciences and Technology, College of Medicine, University of Nigeria, Enugu Campus (UNEC), Enugu, Nigeria.

3Sexual Health Concerns for Commercial Sex Workers (SHCCSW), University of Benin, Benin City, Nigeria.

*Corresponding Author

Bolaji Efosa ODIGIE

Medical Laboratory Science

School of Basic Medical Sciences

College of Medical Sciences

University of Benin

Benin City

Nigeria

Mobile: +2348023345132

Email: bolaji.odigie@uniben.edu

 

Abstract

The present study compared the staining uptake of three modified Papanicolaou staining methods in the assessment of liquid-based cytology samples. Other goals were to check for the most desirable and outstanding qualitative staining method amongst the three modified techniques. Six hundred and sixty (660) liquid-based cytology (LBC) smear samples were collected from 220 patients (3 slides per patient) attending the Center for Disease and Infection Control (CDC), University of Benin Teaching Hospital between January 2014 and April 2016. The LBC smears were marked (L1 to L220) for the Richard Allan Thermoscientific (RAT) method with the corresponding (M1 to M220) for an earlier modified emergency method (MEM) and (N1 to N220) marked to demonstrate the Simplified Alternative Papanicolaou (SAP) method comparatively. SAP lasted for (5±0.5) minutes compared to MEM (7±0.5) and RAT (25±0.5) minutes for the same number of slides (P<0.001). Also, RAT had 3/220(1.4%), MEM 0/220(0%) and SAP 3/220(1.4%) unsatisfactory cytoplasmic staining. The nuclei staining was optimal and distinct in RAT 1/220(0.5%), MEM 2/220(0.9%) and SAP 3/220(1.4%) for the same number of stained smears (P<0.00). Our findings indicate that SAP is both time-saving and economic friendly than other two methods. However, MEM showed an excellent qualitative staining for LBC samples than SAP and RAT.

Keywords: Liquid-based cytology, conventional Papanicolaou staining, modified staining method and Cytodiagnostics.

Download the full article (PDF)

 


 

Publisher   |   Missions and Scope   |  Editorial Board   |  Instructions for Authors   |  Contact Us

 

© American Journal of Biomedical Sciences 2007-2021. All Rights Reserved.